NBCC PRESS CONFERENCE - JANUARY 5, 2007
Diane Coombs
Navy Broadway Complex Coalition


   As we enter 2007, it is time for the citizens of San Diego to declare that the 1992 vision for the 14+ acre Navy Broadway Complex is not only out of date but efforts to implement it have violated our laws and regulations.
   For several decades, we have witnessed the use of our public lands for walling off our waterfront. Only a few areas remain for public use, access, views and enjoyment. The Navy Broadway Complex lands, between Broadway, Harbor Drive and Pacific Highway, which were given to the Navy in the 1920's for military, not private speculative uses, offers us a chance for an alternative vision. A vision meeting the needs of downtown residents, tourists, and workers - all of whom will experience a lack of park and cultural facilities if present plans are implemented.
   This alternative vision brings many benefits: (1) eliminating a Navy facility on the site which is a likely terrorist target; (2) providing needed cultural facilities such as a new home for summer symphony; (3) increased economic benefits for surrounding areas and tax rolls; (4) putting San Diego on the competitive world marketplace map; and (5) an international attraction. To quote Fred Kent, world renowned public space planner: “If they say it can't happen - it is definitively worth doing.”
   Not only have we endured loss of our waterfront in recent times, we have had the Navy take our limited and precious Balboa Park lands for Navy Hospital. The promised benefits - Inspiration Point Park - have yet to be realized decades later!
   The Navy mission is to protect us, not to engage in real estate transactions for which they have no qualifications. They have operated in an atmosphere of secrecy, failed to comply with laws, agreements and regulations as well as the requirements of the outdated 1992 development agreement.
   Today we are here to announce the filing by the San Diego Navy Broadway Complex Coalition, a civil proceeding in the U.S. District Court under the National Environmental Policy Act, among other laws, to challenge the Navy's finding (by Rear Admiral M.A. Handley on Nov 22, 2006) that there will be no significant impact from implementation of that certain development agreement for the Navy Broadway Complex in San Diego, including the execution of one or more long term leases.
   We are undertaking this action on behalf of all San Diego residents with an interest in creating a new area of our waterfront for public use, access and view. The Navy Broadway Complex Coalition encourages all who share our vision to contact their elected officials at all government levels, local state and federal, seeking their assistance and appropriate intervention.
Don Wood
Navy Broadway Complex Coalition


   This project is just one example of a very disturbing effort by the Navy to undercut California's Tidelands Public Trust Doctrine, which is enshrined in our state constitution. Across the state, the Navy is attempting to use the federal courts to remove public trust protection from state tidelands it controls or leases, which would enable the Navy to then turn the land over to private development interests.
   Last Summer Assemblywoman Lori Saldana blew the whistle on the Navy's efforts to privatize the 32 acre local Anti-Submarine Warfare Training Center near Lindbergh Field, which it controls under a 50 year lease with the city. The Navy convinced a federal court judge to overturn public tidelands trust status for the property. In his ruling, the judge said "The United States acquired this portion of the land free of public trust restrictions, and the United States may now covey this portion (of the property) to a private party."
   In Concord, CA, the Navy disrupted a federal Base Reuse and Conversion (BRAC) base reuse planning process for conversion of the Concord Naval Weapons Center to civilian use when it announced it is considering bypassing the local government and the public, and simply trading the property to a politically connected private developer in Baton Rouge, LA, in return for unspecified future improvements to be made on other naval facilities around the country. If this happens, the local government and the public will be cut out of the base reuse planning process and the developer can build anything it wants on the property. Concord's congressional representatives in Washington, D.C. are aggressively challenging this land grab by the Navy and its private developer ally. We would like to see San Diego's congressional delegation doing the same thing.
   As you can see, the Navy Broadway Complex redevelopment effort has statewide and national implications. If the Navy is successful in converting this property into a private development project, cutting the public out of the base conversion planning process, it will be encouraged to do the same thing with local naval bases all along the Pacific coast and across the country. We need to stop this ugly trend here and now. As American taxpayers, we cover all the operations costs of the US Navy. We are paying them to fight our enemies abroad and help protect us from terrorism at home. Our tax dollars should not be misused to subsidize the Navy turning into real estate speculators and turning all the California naval bases into high-rise hotels and shopping malls.
Jeannette Hartman
Sierra Club


   The Sierra Club joins the Broadway Complex Coalition in its assertion that the outdated environmental report prepared in 1992 is both incomplete and inadequate to assess the true impact of the huge development proposed for the Navy Broadway Complex. The law requires preparation of a new environmental assessment or an addendum to an existing assessment if conditions pertaining to a development have changed.
   The opinion provided by the City Attorney and the CEQA appeals submitted to the City Council by members of the public are in harmony that the pace of downtown development, environmental regulations governing that development, and environmental indicators affected by development such as water quality, air quality and traffic level have all changed substantially since 1992. The City Attorney and the Broadway Complex Coalition are also in harmony that construction of a Navy headquarters building on the waterfront may pose an unacceptable risk to the public from terrorist attack. It is an outrage to put the public at risk so that Navy executives and their contractors can enjoy a view of the waterfront.
   We ask that Councilmember Peters lead the Council in protecting the citizens of San Diego and the environment in which we live by requiring an adequate and true environmental assessment of the development proposed for the Navy Broadway Complex.
   The investigation of the Navy Broadway Complex lease called by Congressman Filner is both timely and needed. Here and elsewhere in California, the US Navy is giving away valuable properties to developers in exchange for construction services of considerably less value. These are properties that should have gone through the Base Realignment and Closure Process and the attendant public benefit. The Navy should be obtaining construction services through its normal procurement process rather than trading public land at bargain basement prices. An investigation into the entire BRAC process is necessary to halt the exploitation of public lands by the Navy and its contractors.